Which Websites Does ChatGPT Cite the Most?
Klaas FoppenReal-time data: Social Media & Community Platforms
This chart displays the percentage of ChatGPT responses citing social platforms. Reddit typically leads at 2-4%, which shows AI's preference for community-driven content. Watch how LinkedIn, Medium, and Quora compete for AI visibility.
Unlock Full Data Access
Enter your email to see complete citation data and track AI search trends across all platforms.
What this means for you
Reddit is the only social platform ChatGPT cites at scale: typically a few percent of all citations on a given day, more than ten times LinkedIn's share and far ahead of YouTube, Medium, Quora, and X, which barely register. When ChatGPT wants a social perspective, it reaches for community threads, not feeds or video.
The line is also volatile: Reddit's share can shrink by close to half within days as OpenAI adjusts retrieval. Community content is ChatGPT's favorite social source, but how heavily it leans on it changes fast.
How to act on it
- Build a genuine, sustained presence in the subreddits your customers frequent. Helpful answers and detailed comparison threads are the social content ChatGPT actually retrieves and cites.
- Treat LinkedIn as the clear number two: substantive articles and posts there earn a small but steady citation share, especially for B2B topics.
- Don't sink GEO budget into X or Quora for ChatGPT visibility. Both sit at effectively zero percent of citations in this data.
Social Media Citation Analysis (Fixed date when Reddit changes were made)
This chart displays the percentage of ChatGPT responses citing social platforms. Reddit typically leads at 2-4%, which shows AI's preference for community-driven content. Watch how LinkedIn, Medium, and Quora compete for AI visibility.
What this means for you
This frozen window captures a structural break worth studying: in early September 2025 Reddit accounted for roughly 10-14% of all ChatGPT citations, then collapsed to around 1% within days after Reddit's access changes, a drop of about 90% that never recovered during this period. A single platform decision erased what had been the dominant citation source on ChatGPT almost overnight.
How to act on it
- Treat this as the canonical argument against single-platform GEO strategies: spread your citable content across your own domain and several trusted third-party platforms.
- If a large share of your AI visibility flows through one platform today, monitor your citation share weekly so a platform-level change doesn't blindside you the way this one did.
- Invest in content on domains you control. It's the only citation source that can't be switched off by someone else's business decision.
B2B Software Review Platforms: AI Citation Frequency
Analyze how often ChatGPT cites B2B review sites when recommending software. G2 and Capterra dominate with 1-2% citation rates. These metrics show which review platforms influence AI-powered purchase decisions, which matters for any B2B SaaS company managing its reviews.
What this means for you
G2 and Trustpilot are the review platforms ChatGPT actually cites, each holding roughly 0.1-0.3% of all citations, with Trustpilot trending upward through June. Capterra sits at about half their share, while GetApp, Software Advice, and Clutch barely appear. Those percentages look small, but they're measured against every citation on every topic. On software and vendor-selection prompts specifically, these two sites routinely occupy one of the few citation slots available.
How to act on it
- Concentrate on G2 and Trustpilot first: complete profiles, accurate categorization, and a steady flow of recent reviews give ChatGPT current, citable material about your product.
- Run an always-on review generation program rather than occasional pushes. Retrieval favors fresh content, and Trustpilot's rising share rewards recency.
- Skip the long tail of review directories for GEO purposes; this data shows they contribute almost nothing to ChatGPT visibility.
Knowledge Base & Reference Sites: Citation Dominance
Wikipedia leads with 3-5% of all ChatGPT citations, establishing it as the AI's primary knowledge source. Track how academic (arXiv), financial (Investopedia), and tech guide sites compete for authority status in AI responses.
Unlock Full Data Access
Enter your email to see complete citation data and track AI search trends across all platforms.
What this means for you
Wikipedia remains ChatGPT's most cited knowledge base, typically 0.4-1% of all citations daily, with arXiv a strong second, which is remarkable for an academic preprint server. Encyclopedic and research sources retain deep structural trust. Among consumer reference sites, Tom's Guide clearly outperforms Investopedia and Lifewire, suggesting practical how-to and buying guidance earns more retrieval than glossary-style content.
How to act on it
- Keep your Wikipedia presence accurate and well-sourced where notability allows. It remains one of the most retrieved domains on the web.
- If your company produces original research or data, publish it openly (arXiv for academic work, or a citable research section on your own site). ChatGPT rewards primary sources.
- Structure your reference content the way these winners do: clear definitions, verifiable facts, cited sources, and answers to specific practical questions.
News Media Citation Trends: Publishing Authority in AI
Measure citation frequency for major news outlets in ChatGPT responses. TechRadar, Forbes, and Business Insider show 1-3% citation rates. These patterns show which media brands carry the most weight in AI-generated answers and help publishers optimize for AI discoverability.
What this means for you
TechRadar is the standout news source at roughly 0.3-0.6% of all ChatGPT citations, around three times Business Insider and Forbes, which cluster near 0.1-0.2%. Prestige business outlets like the Financial Times and The Times sit far lower. Product-review journalism (best-of lists, buying guides, hands-on testing) earns dramatically more ChatGPT retrieval than general business reporting.
How to act on it
- Reweight digital PR toward review-driven tech publishers: a placement in a TechRadar buying guide is worth more AI visibility than a prestige business mention.
- Pitch for inclusion in "best X for Y" roundups specifically. That's the article format ChatGPT keeps citing.
- Publish your own honest comparison and buying-guide content; the format itself attracts citations, and your domain can compete for the same prompts.
How we collect this data
We collect millions of prompt responses, citations, and click data from the actual user interfaces of major AI platforms: over 26 billion data points and growing. This gives us one of the largest datasets on how AI search engines cite sources and recommend brands.
Real UI monitoring
Data straight from the interfaces of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, AI Overviews, and more.
26B+ data points
Over 26 billion analyzed citations, prompts, and responses, one of the largest AI search datasets available.
Continuously updated
Refreshed constantly so the trends you see reflect the latest behavior of AI search engines.
Aggregated & public
Published freely for the GEO community, based on aggregated, non-identifiable trends.
Want to start tracking your own AI search data? Get started with Promptwatch
Track Your Brand's Visibility in AI Search
Join 1,500+ brands monitoring their AI visibility. Get alerts when competitors appear in AI responses and optimize your GEO strategy with real-time citation data.
